How should CFOs optimize engineering spend? Stop looking at "Average Cost Per Head." Start looking at "Cost Per Outcome." Optimization comes from three levers:
For most CFOs, the engineering department is a black box. You put money in (Payroll, AWS credits, SaaS licenses), and software comes out. But unlike Sales (CAC/LTV) or Marketing (ROAS), Engineering lacks a clear efficiency metric.
When budget cuts loom, this opacity is dangerous. The standard response is a "10% Blanket Cut" across the board.
This is a mistake. Cutting 10% of headcount might reduce output by 50% if you accidentally cut the "10x Engineers" or the glue holding the legacy system together.
A "Zombie Project" is an initiative that is officially "active" in Jira but hasn't shipped value in months. Engineers are billing time to it, but it's going nowhere.
If you must reduce costs, you need a scalpel, not a sledgehammer. You need to categorize your talent pool into buckets based on Impact and Utilization:
Are you leaving money on the table? Many organizations under-report their R&D tax credits because manually tracking "Capitalizable Work" is a nightmare. An AI Efficiency Finder can automatically tag work that qualifies for capitalization, instantly improving your bottom line without firing a single person.
Need to optimize 10% without breaking delivery? Use our IT Budget Optimization Tool to find the "Efficiency Finder" scenarios in your org chart today.
